SC takes note of contradictory stands of two amicus curiae in Sabarimala case

Two senior lawyers, appointed by the Supreme Court as amicus curiae to assist it in deciding the sensitive issue of ban on entry of women of a particular age group in Kerala's Sabarimala temple, took diametrically opposite stands.

Noted senior lawyer Raju Ramachandran took a progressive modern view and supported the PIL of Indian Young Lawyers Association, saying that women have "universal and legal right" to enter into the temple, which is a public shrine.

"It is the freedom of conscience and the right to practice and profess their religion which is recognized under Article 25 of the Constitution of India... encompasses the liberty of belief, faith, and worship, pithily declared as a constitutional vision in the Preamble to the Constitution of India," Ramachandran had submitted before the five-judge constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Dipak Misra.

However, another senior lawyer K Ramamoorthy, assisting the bench as an amicus curiae, had a different take over the controversial issue.

He maintained that in all prominent Hindu temples in India there had been some religious practices based on beliefs which are an essential part of the Hindu religion as considered by people for a long time.

Batting for the preservation of centuries-old practice banning women of certain age group, Ramamoorthy had said that the devotees of Ayyappa form a separate religious denomination and hence protected under the fundamental rights governing religious freedom.

The repression of women under the garb of "physiological factors" cannot be legitimized and patriarchy in religion cannot "trump over" devotion, the Supreme Court ruled Friday as it threw open the closed gates of the historic Sabarimala temple for women of all age groups.

The historic verdict, which would add force to clamor for equality for women of other religions, extensively dealt with Article 25 (1) which was referred to by the Temple Board and the devotees in support of the practice of barring entry of girls and women between the menstrual age of 10 and 50 years.