Prophet remark row: SC transfers all FIRs against Nupur Sharma to Delhi Police

The top court allowed Sharma to move Delhi High Court for quashing FIRs lodged over her remark on the Prophet made during a TV debate show and said all future FIRs would also be transferred to Delhi Police for investigation.It also refused the prayer of senior advocate Menaka Guruswamy, appearing for the West Bengal government, seeking an investigation by a court-appointed SIT.

(Eds: Adding more details) New Delhi, Aug 10 (PTI)The Supreme Court Wednesday provided relief to suspended BJP spokeswoman Nupur Sharma by clubbing all the FIRs lodged across the country and transferring them to Delhi Police in connection with her remark on the Prophet, saying it was inclined to follow the view taken by the apex court in Mohammed Zubair's case.

''Whatever view we have taken as a three-judge bench in the Mohammed Zubair case and some other cases, we will follow,'' said a bench of Justices Surya Kant and J B Pardiwala, which ordered that the future FIRs against Sharma would also be transferred to the Delhi Police. A three-judge bench had on July 20 ordered the release of Zubair, co-founder of Alt News, on interim bail in all the FIRs lodged in Uttar Pradesh against him for alleged hate speech, saying ''exercise of the power of arrest must be pursued sparingly'' and transferred all the cases in UP to Delhi. The top court on Wednesday extended the interim protection from any coercive action to Sharma till the probe is concluded by the Intelligence Fusion & Strategic Operations (IFSO) of the Delhi Police.

It said IFSO shall be at liberty to take assistance from other police forces to take the case to a logical end.

''Since this Court has already taken cognizance of the serious threat to life and security of the petitioner (Sharma), we direct that all FIRs against Nupur Sharma be transferred and clubbed for the investigation to the Delhi Police. ''In particular facts and circumstances, we clarify and deem it appropriate that the investigation is carried out by Delhi police. The petitioner shall be at Liberty to pursue her rights and remedies by approaching Delhi High Court for quashing the current and future FIRs,'' the bench said. The top court allowed Sharma to move Delhi High Court for quashing FIRs lodged over her remark on the Prophet made during a TV debate show and said all future FIRs would also be transferred to Delhi Police for investigation.

It also refused the prayer of senior advocate Menaka Guruswamy, appearing for the West Bengal government, seeking an investigation by a court-appointed SIT. At the outset, senior advocate Maninder Singh, appearing for Sharma, said the apex court's intervention has been sought due to the extraordinary situation caused by the threats received by Sharma following the telecast of the show. The senior lawyer said that she was receiving summons from the West Bengal police despite the apex court order.

Objecting to the transfer of FIRs to Delhi, Guruswamy submitted that the first FIR against the petitioner was registered in Mumbai.

''The accused cannot be allowed to pick the jurisdiction. And the maximum impact of her statements is caused in West Bengal. The maximum amount of impact and outrage has been caused in West Bengal. Delhi is not on the list. I don't understand why my friend is pushing for Delhi. Should we create a situation today where the accused is allowed to pick jurisdiction? she said. Guruswamy said no new circumstances have emerged in the case and the West Bengal government will provide security to Sharma.

''What they are doing is forum shopping,'' she said while seeking that a court-appointed SIT may carry out an investigation.

''The prayer they are asking in this application was rejected by this court earlier. This issue has unfortunately inflamed the country. There have been politicians on both sides who have come out in support of this statement. I propose a joint SIT which is monitored by this court. Supreme Court as a moral authority can look into this. My friends have not come with clean hands,'' she said.

The top court said it was not inclined to go into the merits of the allegations and counter allegations.

On the issue of monitoring the SIT probe as sought by Guruswamy, the apex court said there will be undue and undesirable pressure on investigative agencies when the court is monitoring the investigation.

''Investigating agencies should have an independent atmosphere to work in. Let's not create a situation where everybody is under stress. Clubbing of FIRs is necessary because of the grave situation which has arisen,'' the bench said. The top court said that it would club all the FIR registered against Sharma with the FIR registered in Delhi and direct the investigation to be carried out by Delhi police. It also refused to keep pending the petition filed by Sharma and asked the parties to approach it in case of any clarification. The telecast dated May 26, 2022, on the TV channel ''Times Now'' has led to the registration of various FIRs and complaints against the petitioner in different parts of the country.

Sharma's remark on the Prophet during a TV debate had triggered protests across the country and drew sharp reactions from many Gulf countries. The BJP subsequently suspended her from the party On July 19, the apex court granted interim protection from arrest till August 10 to Sharma in connection with the FIRs filed against her. It had also protected her from any coercive action in the FIRs/complaints which may be registered or entertained in the future about the May 26 telecast.

On July 1, the same bench of the top court severely criticised Sharma for her controversial comments against the Prophet, saying her ''loose tongue'' has ''set the entire country on fire'' and that she is ''single-handedly responsible for what is happening in the country''. PTI PKS RKS RKS

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)