Former Australian PM says subs ''worst deal in all history''

Former Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating on Wednesday launched a blistering attack on his nations plan to buy nuclear-powered submarines from the United States to modernise its fleet, saying it must be the worst deal in all history. Speaking at a National Press Club event, Keating said the submarines wouldnt serve a useful military purpose.The only way the Chinese could threaten Australia or attack it is on land.

Former Australian Prime Minister Paul Keating on Wednesday launched a blistering attack on his nation's plan to buy nuclear-powered submarines from the United States to modernise its fleet, saying “it must be the worst deal in all history.” Speaking at a National Press Club event, Keating said the submarines wouldn't serve a useful military purpose.

“The only way the Chinese could threaten Australia or attack it is on land. That is, they bring an armada of troop ships with a massive army to occupy us,” Keating said. “This is not possible for the Chinese to do.” He added that Australia would sink any such Chinese armada with planes and missiles.

“The idea that we need American submarines to protect us,” Keating said. “If we buy eight, three are at sea. Three are going to protect us from the might of China. Really? I mean, the rubbish of it. The rubbish.” Australia's deal — announced Monday in San Diego by US President Joe Biden, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak — came amid growing concern about China's military buildup and influence in the Indo-Pacific.

Biden emphasised that the submarines wouldn't carry nuclear weapons of any kind.

Australian Defense Minister Richard Marles said the deal was necessary to counter the biggest conventional military buildup in the region since World War II.

“We have to take the step of developing the capability to operate a nuclear-powered submarine so that we can hand over a much more self-reliant nation to our children and to our grandchildren,'' Marles said.

China said Tuesday the US, Australia and the United Kingdom were travelling “further down the wrong and dangerous path for their own geopolitical self-interest” in inking the deal, which has been given the acronym AUKUS.

China renewed its objections at length on Wednesday, accusing the three countries of “coercing” the International Atomic Energy Agency into endorsing the deal.

“China calls on all member states of the (IAEA) to actively promote the intergovernmental process to find a solution to the safeguards issues related to US-British-Australian nuclear submarine cooperation ... and maintain international peace and security,” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin said at a daily briefing.

Keating served as prime minister for more than four years in the 1990s. He was from the Labour Party, the same party as Albanese.

Keating said the submarine deal was the worst international decision by the Labour Party in more than 100 years, when it unsuccessfully tried to introduce conscription during World War I.

Keating also mocked the cost of the deal, which Australian officials have estimated at between 268 billion and 368 billion Australian dollars (USD 178-USD 245 billion) over three decades. Australian officials say the deal will create 20,000 jobs.

“For USD 360 billion, we're going to get eight submarines,” Keating said. “It must be the worst deal in all history.” At the Press Club event, Keating was questioned about whether his own ties to China had influenced his views.

He said he had no commercial interests in China and had stopped serving on a bank board five years ago.

“I was on the China Development Bank board for 13 years, and 10 years as chairman,” Keating said, adding that his fee, or honorarium, was USD 5,000 a year.

Keating also lashed out at some journalists at the event, telling one reporter her question “is so dumb, it's hardly worth an answer” and another that “you should hang your head in shame” over his newspaper's recent coverage of China's perceived threat to Australia.

“For the record, Mr. Keating, we're very proud of our journalism and we think that it has made an important contribution to the national debate,” responded the second journalist, Matthew Knott from The Sydney Morning Herald.

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)