Hawaii Military Families Sue Government Over 2021 Jet Fuel Leak that Contaminated Water

A trial is underway in Hawaii for a mass environmental injury case involving jet fuel contamination in Pearl Harbor's drinking water. The US government admits the spill but disputes the extent of health effects. Plaintiffs allege vomiting, rashes, and other health issues due to jet fuel exposure, despite Navy assurances of water safety. Navy investigations reveal a series of errors that led to the spill. This bellwether trial will determine the likelihood of success in similar lawsuits and potentially influence future damage awards or settlements.

A trial for a mass environmental injury case begins in Hawaii on Monday, more than two years after a US military fuel tank facility under ground poisoned thousands of people when it leaked jet fuel into Pearl Harbour's drinking water.

Instead of a jury, a judge in US District Court in Honolulu will hear about a lawsuit against the United States by 17 "bellwether" plaintiffs: a cross-selection of relatives of military members representing more than 7,500 others, including service members, in three federal lawsuits.

According to court documents, the US government has admitted the November 20, 2021, spill at the Red Hill Bulk Fuel Storage Facility caused a nuisance for the plaintiffs, that the United States "breached its duty of care" and that the plaintiffs suffered compensable injuries.

But they dispute whether the residents were exposed to jet fuel at levels high enough to cause their alleged health effects, ranging from vomiting to rashes.

The plaintiffs have submitted declarations describing how the water crisis sickened them and left them with ongoing health problems, including seizures, asthma, eczema and vestibular dysfunction.

Nastasia Freeman, wife of a Navy lieutenant and mother of three, described how the family thought their vomiting and diarrhea was Thanksgiving food poisoning.

"I had developed a rash on my arms with sores and lesions on my scalp, feet, and hands accompanied by a headache," she wrote. "I had a very strange sensation that I had never had before — I felt like my blood was on fire." Even their dogs were vomiting.

On November 29, a nurse told her she received multiple calls all with a common theme: the tap water.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs argue Navy officials knew there was fuel in the water and failed to warn people not to drink it, even while telling residents the water was safe.

"It felt like we were being gaslit," Freeman's declaration filed in the case said. "We knew the water wasn't safe, but the Navy was telling us that it was. They said they didn't know what was in the water and that they were investigating.'" A Navy investigation report in 2022 listed a cascading series of mistakes from May 6, 2021, when an operator error caused a pipe to rupture and caused 21,000 gallons (80,000 litres) of fuel to spill while it was transferred between tanks. Most of this fuel spilled into a fire suppression line and sat there for six months, causing the line to sag. When a cart rammed into this sagging line on November 20, it released 20,000 gallons (75,700 litres) of fuel.

The military eventually agreed to drain the tanks after the 2021 spill, amid state orders and protests from Native Hawaiians and other Hawaii residents concerned about the threat posed to Honolulu's water supply. The tanks sit above an aquifer supplying water to 400,000 people in urban Honolulu.

A lot is riding on this trial.

"A bellwether trial helps attorneys to understand the likely success or failure of the cases that are in the pipeline," explained Loretta Sheehan, a Honolulu-based personal injury attorney not involved in the water litigation.

The outcome can help determine future damages to be awarded or settlements, she said.

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)