South Korea's Historic Impeachment: A Democratic Defiance
South Korea's parliament impeached President Yoon Suk Yeol over a martial law decree, marking a significant democratic milestone. The National Assembly voted 204-85 to suspend Yoon's powers. Met with public jubilation, the impeachment underscores tensions in Korean politics with charges of rebellion and constitutional threats ensuing.
- Country:
- South Korea
In a historic move, South Korea's parliament voted to impeach President Yoon Suk Yeol following his martial law decree, a decision celebrated by crowds highlighting the nation's democratic resilience. The motion passed with a 204-85 vote, resulting in the suspension of Yoon's powers. Prime Minister Han Duck-soo will assume presidential duties as the Constitutional Court reviews the impeachment.
The controversial decree, which lasted only six hours, caused significant political unrest, disrupted diplomatic ties, and rattled financial markets. Opposition parties accused Yoon of rebellion for attempting to suppress parliamentary operations. As public protests escalated, support for Yoon dwindled, reflected in his approval rating plummeting to 11%.
This marks the third instance of a South Korean president facing impeachment while in office. Amid a highly polarized political landscape, Yoon maintains his stance, viewing the impeachment as a temporary setback. Legal proceedings appear forthcoming, with significant implications for South Korea's democratic and legal frameworks.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
South Korean Military Officials Indicted in Martial Law Probe
South Korea's Constitutional Court Trials: A Pivotal Moment
Legal Battles: Power Struggles and Controversy Surrounding Yoon Suk Yeol's Martial Law Probe
Leadership Crisis: South Korea Awaits Crucial Constitutional Court Decision
South Korea's Tumultuous Political Crisis: From Martial Law to Impeachment