Court Clash: Trump's Alleged Deportation Defiance Under Scrutiny
A U.S. judge suggested the Trump administration may have violated a court order halting the deportation of alleged Venezuelan gang members. This has sparked concerns regarding the administration's compliance with court rulings, prompting legislative and legal scrutiny.

In a recent court hearing, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg raised concerns about the Trump administration's compliance with a court order blocking deportations. The judge found a 'fair likelihood' that the administration violated the order by deporting alleged Venezuelan gang members despite a temporary ban.
The deportations, conducted under a rarely used 18th-century law, have raised alarm among Democrats and some legal analysts. The potential violation has led to questions about the administration's willingness to adhere to unfavorable legal decisions, with President Trump controversially calling for the judge's impeachment.
Judge Boasberg has not yet decided on further action but indicated that ongoing proceedings could determine if Trump's officials should face contempt charges. Meanwhile, Justice Department lawyers argue that the deportations had already occurred when the ruling was announced, maintaining that the judge lacked the authority to reverse them.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
SC, however, junks plea for contempt action against BJP's Nishikant Dubey over remarks against judiciary, CJI.
Pollution bodies vacancies: SC issues contempt notices to chief secretaries of Delhi, UP, Haryana and Rajasthan over non-compliance.
Federal Judge Approves Fast-Track Deportations Under Alien Enemies Act
Court Ruling Supports Fast-Track Deportations with Alien Enemies Act
Supreme Court Issues Contempt Notices to Six States Over Judges' Benefits