Godhra Case Controversy: The Battle for Acquittal
The Gujarat government opposed a plea for acquittal by Abdul Raheman Dhantiya in the 2002 Godhra train burning case, accusing him of inciting a violent mob. Dhantiya disputes his conviction, citing unreliable testimonies. The Supreme Court will continue hearing the case focusing on allegations of broader conspiracy.
- Country:
- India
The Gujarat government has challenged the plea for acquittal filed by Abdul Raheman Dhantiya in the 2002 Godhra train burning case, arguing that Dhantiya incited a violent mob to chant anti-India slogans.
The state's counsel presented evidence linking Dhantiya to the mob, which allegedly engaged in stone-pelting before the tragic fire that resulted in 58 deaths. The state insists his participation in such events cannot be condoned.
Dhantiya, a former municipal leader, claims innocence and highlights the prosecution's reliance on a witness he deems unreliable. The Supreme Court is set to resume hearings, focusing on the alleged conspiracy behind the incident.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Poker and Law: The Double Life of a Supreme Court Advocate
Tug of Power: Supreme Court Examines ED's Allegation Against Mamata Banerjee
Bail Parity Sought in 2020 Delhi Riots Case Amid Supreme Court Decisions
Border Tensions: Supreme Court Weighs Security and Health with Assam Hospital Project
Calcutta HC I-PAC raid hearing: ED seeks adjournment of matter stating it has filed petition in Supreme Court.

