Godhra Case Controversy: The Battle for Acquittal

The Gujarat government opposed a plea for acquittal by Abdul Raheman Dhantiya in the 2002 Godhra train burning case, accusing him of inciting a violent mob. Dhantiya disputes his conviction, citing unreliable testimonies. The Supreme Court will continue hearing the case focusing on allegations of broader conspiracy.

Godhra Case Controversy: The Battle for Acquittal
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

The Gujarat government has challenged the plea for acquittal filed by Abdul Raheman Dhantiya in the 2002 Godhra train burning case, arguing that Dhantiya incited a violent mob to chant anti-India slogans.

The state’s counsel presented evidence linking Dhantiya to the mob, which allegedly engaged in stone-pelting before the tragic fire that resulted in 58 deaths. The state insists his participation in such events cannot be condoned.

Dhantiya, a former municipal leader, claims innocence and highlights the prosecution's reliance on a witness he deems unreliable. The Supreme Court is set to resume hearings, focusing on the alleged conspiracy behind the incident.

Give Feedback

Use this form for editorial or site feedback. We usually reply within 2 to 3 working days.

By submitting, you agree that we may use your email address to respond.