Supreme Court Questions Justice Varma's Plea Against In-House Inquiry

The Supreme Court questioned Justice Yashwant Varma's decision to challenge an in-house inquiry report that found him guilty of misconduct concerning cash discovery. The court raised concerns about his approach, emphasizing that the Constitution outlines removal procedures. The CJI's recommendation for Varma's removal faces challenges amid procedural debates.

In a striking courtroom development, the Supreme Court expressed doubts over Justice Yashwant Varma's appeal against a panel report asserting his misconduct. Varma's plea emerged after a committee discovered burnt cash at his residence during his Delhi High Court tenure, leading to his indictment.

Justice Varma's challenge underscores a constitutional debate on judge removal. With references to the Judges (Inquiry) Act, arguments emphasize the lack of legal safeguards in in-house procedures, suggesting potential overreach of judicial authority.

The hearing featured Chief Justice of India's pivotal role in judicial accountability, prompting legal discourse on constitutional boundaries as articulated by senior advocate Kapil Sibal.

(With inputs from agencies.)