Courtroom Controversy: Shoe Drama Unfolds Before India's CJI

The Supreme Court declined to pursue contempt charges against Rakesh Kishore for throwing a shoe at the Chief Justice of India. Despite calls from the Supreme Court Bar Association for action, the court emphasized leniency and considers preventive measures to avoid future occurrences of such disrespectful acts in judicial settings.

The Supreme Court has decided against taking contempt action against a lawyer who attempted to throw a shoe at Chief Justice of India, BR Gavai. However, the court is considering creating guidelines to prevent future incidents.

Despite the act being deemed a clear case of contempt, the Chief Justice himself opted for leniency, influencing the bench's decision. The Supreme Court Bar Association had urged for contempt proceedings, asserting that the CJI's pardon was in a personal capacity and should not bind the court's institutional decisions.

The court, recognizing potential glorification of the incident on social media, is focusing on how to prevent similar events rather than extending the incident's publicity. The bench emphasized the importance of protecting the integrity and dignity of judicial proceedings.

(With inputs from agencies.)