Teens Challenge Social Media Ban in High Court: Free Speech at Stake?

Two teenagers are challenging an Australian law banning social media accounts for those under 16, claiming it unconstitutionally limits free political communication. The Digital Freedom Project, backing the case, argues the law imposes a heavy burden on political communication and suggests less restrictive alternatives.

In a significant legal move, two teenagers are taking the Australian federal government to the High Court, arguing that a new ban on social media accounts for individuals under 16 is unconstitutional. The law, set to be enforced from December 10, is claimed to interfere with free political communication.

The Digital Freedom Project, led by NSW upper house MP John Ruddick, spearheads the case. The group suggests the law imposes an unwarranted burden on political communication and offers alternatives such as parental consent pathways and age-appropriate content moderation.

Ahead of the legislation's implementation, the eSafety Commissioner has provided resources for young people and families. As the case unfolds, the High Court may be asked for an urgent injunction to prevent the law's enforcement until a ruling is made.

(With inputs from agencies.)