Supreme Court Halts Liquor Shop Relocation amidst Highway Safety Concerns

The Supreme Court stayed an order from the Rajasthan High Court mandating the relocation of liquor shops near highways due to increased road accidents. The apex court highlighted the need for government discretion in liquor licensing within municipal limits, balancing safety and fiscal interests.

The Supreme Court has temporarily halted the Rajasthan High Court's directive to move liquor shops situated within 500 metres of national and state highways. The stay comes amid concerns over rising highway accidents linked to alcohol consumption.

A bench led by Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta acknowledged the genuine concern of the high court but emphasized the need for government reconsideration of its liquor policy. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta indicated that while the apex court had previously enforced the 500-metre restriction, allowances were made for municipal areas. Senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi argued for the liquor vendors, pointing out procedural lapses in the high court's order.

The high court's prior ruling highlighted the alarming road fatalities due to alcohol and called for state compliance with previous Supreme Court directives. Despite significant revenue from these shops, the court stressed the primacy of public safety over fiscal gains. This ongoing legal discourse challenges the balance between state revenue interests and highway safety measures.

(With inputs from agencies.)