The House of Lords: Tradition Under Scrutiny Amid Calls for Reform

The UK's House of Lords faces scrutiny following former ambassador Peter Mandelson's resignation over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Critiques highlight its undemocratic nature and the sluggish pace of reform. Controversies fuel debates on members' selection, with suggestions to abolish or transform it into an elected chamber.

The historic House of Lords, Britain's unelected upper parliamentary chamber, is under renewed scrutiny. Former UK ambassador to Washington, Peter Mandelson, was compelled to resign after his association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein surfaced, stirring debates on the institution's relevance."

For centuries, the Lords has played a role in reviewing legislation passed by the House of Commons. Critics argue that it needs significant reform to match modern democratic values. The recent challenges have bolstered calls to either abolish or democratize the role of its 850 members-for-life.

Amid mounting controversies, including the selection process for Lords members, advocates for change propose transforming it into an elected chamber, replacing antiquated titles with modern ones such as 'Senator'. "It's time for a change," said one proponent, stressing the urgency of reform.

(With inputs from agencies.)