California to examine tighter rules for recall elections after Newsom victory
"The voters want to see a more democratic process put in place that keeps elected officials accountable, but prevents political gamesmanship of the rules." Glazer and Assembly member Marc Berman, both Democrats, said they would hold bipartisan hearings in coming months to consider possible changes to the system, which would require amending the state constitution. Republican strategist Mike Madrid said the talk of reform was a partisan ploy by Democrats.
- United States
A day after California voters resoundingly rejected a Republican-backed effort to oust Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom from his job, lawmakers began considering ways to reform the state's system for recalling elected officials.
Newsom on Tuesday handily beat back the challenge with 64% of the vote, sending a decisive message that voters in the deeply Democratic state supported his policies for tackling COVID-19, immigration and crime. The election was expensive to run, and Californians will go to the polls anyway next year to select a new governor. It also presented the possibility that a replacement candidate with fewer than a majority of votes could become governor.
"It is time to re-evaluate and update California's recall process," said State Senator Steve Glazer, chairman of the Senate Committee on Elections and Constitutional Amendments. "The voters want to see a more democratic process put in place that keeps elected officials accountable, but prevents political gamesmanship of the rules." Glazer and Assembly member Marc Berman, both Democrats, said they would hold bipartisan hearings in coming months to consider possible changes to the system, which would require amending the state constitution.
Republican strategist Mike Madrid said the talk of reform was a partisan ploy by Democrats. "Throwing out a powerful tool to protect democracy for purely partisan aims is misguided and dangerous," Madrid said.
California spent an estimated $270 million on the special election, which was forced on to the ballot after a conservative group called the Patriot Coalition collected 1.5 million signatures to request a referendum on whether Newsom should be recalled. Newsom raised nearly $70 million to fight off the recall attempt, and a handful of Republicans seeking to challenge him raised another $40 million.
Under California's century-old recall process, opponents of a sitting elected official need to gather signatures from just 12% of the number of people who voted in the last election for that office in order to force a special recall election. There need be no malfeasance or allegations of corruption, just a desire to oust the office-holder is enough to put it on the ballot. And while a majority of those voting in the election must agree to oust the office-holder, a majority of votes is not required to choose a replacement - only a plurality.
This means that someone with a minority of support could wind up in office. Since the recall process was enacted in 1911, there have been 55 attempts to oust the governor, 80 attempts to recall state lawmakers and 27 attempts to recall state Supreme Court Justices, among others, state records show.
Of the 179 efforts, only 11 qualified for the ballot and just six resulted in the official being ousted. One governor, Gray Davis, was recalled in 2003, and replaced with movie star Arnold Schwarzenegger. Still Assembly Speak Anthony Rendon urged caution.
"We came far too close to having a Governor elected by a tiny fraction of eligible voters," Rendon said. "While that is no way to pick the leader of the most populous state in the nation, it would be equally wrong to make any changes without a thorough study of alternatives."
(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)