ACLU Sues Biden Administration Over Controversial Asylum Ban

U.S. immigrant rights groups, led by the ACLU, have sued the Biden administration over a policy barring most migrants from seeking asylum if caught crossing the U.S.-Mexico border illegally. The lawsuit claims the policy violates U.S. asylum law and bypasses proper regulatory procedures. Biden's stance mirrors Trump-era policies.

Reuters | Updated: 13-06-2024 04:30 IST | Created: 13-06-2024 04:30 IST
ACLU Sues Biden Administration Over Controversial Asylum Ban
AI Generated Representative Image

U.S. immigrant rights groups sued the Biden administration on Wednesday over a new policy that bars most migrants caught crossing the U.S.-Mexico border illegally from claiming asylum. The groups, led by the American Civil Liberties Union, argued restrictions implemented last week violated U.S. asylum law and that Biden failed to follow proper regulatory procedure. The lawsuit was filed in federal court in Washington, D.C.

Biden, a Democrat seeking another term in Nov. 5 elections, has grappled with millions of people caught illegally crossing the southwest border during his presidency. Immigration is a top election issue and Biden's Republican challenger, former President Donald Trump, has vowed to crack down aggressively if he wins another term in the White House. Biden has toughened his stance in recent months, backing a bipartisan Senate bill that would surge resources to the border and expand enforcement capacity. The new ban mirrors Trump-era policies that sought to deny migrants access to asylum at the border and utilizes the same legal authority as Trump's travel bans blocking people from majority-Muslim nations and elsewhere.

Lee Gelernt, deputy director of the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project, said the Biden administration "lacks unilateral authority" to override laws created by Congress, citing previous legal decisions related to Trump-era policies. Migrants caught crossing illegally can be quickly deported or turned back to Mexico under the Biden measure. The ban included exceptions for unaccompanied children, people who face serious medical or safety threats and victims of trafficking.

Key operational questions remain unclear, including how the U.S. would quickly deport migrants from countries that are far away or have frosty relations with the U.S. and whether Mexico will accept more non-Mexico migrants apprehended by U.S. authorities. The number of migrants caught illegally crossing the border dropped by 20% late last week, which one senior U.S. border official said signaled "possible early success" deterring illegal immigration.

White House spokesperson Angelo Fernandez Hernandez defended the asylum ban, saying it was necessary because "border encounters remain too high" and Republican lawmakers have blocked Biden-backed legislation. In the lawsuit filed on Wednesday, the immigrant rights groups also targeted a part of the Biden asylum ban that requires migrants to express a fear being returned to their home countries before being able to seek humanitarian protection rather than have U.S. authorities ask about it.

The groups said people who recently crossed the border "may be hungry, exhausted, ill, or traumatized after fleeing persecution in their home countries and danger in Mexico."

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Give Feedback