Supreme Court Debates Trump's Birthright Citizenship Directive

The Supreme Court is scrutinizing President Trump's directive to limit birthright citizenship, challenging longstanding constitutional interpretations. The directive—an effort to curb immigration—focuses on children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents. Justices pose tough questions, debating historical and legal perspectives. The ruling could impact 250,000 annual births.

President Donald Trump's presence at the Supreme Court signaled the high stakes surrounding his directive to curb birthright citizenship in the U.S. The contentious directive challenges the traditional understanding of a significant constitutional provision, sparking intense legal scrutiny and debate.

Justices, including conservative Chief Justice John Roberts, questioned the legality of Trump's order, designed to prevent children born to non-citizens in the U.S. from acquiring automatic citizenship—a move critics argue violates the 14th Amendment. Liberal justices probe the historical context, emphasizing that Trump's legal interpretations clash with established precedent.

The directive, pivotal to Trump's immigration policy, could affect the citizenship claims of 250,000 children born annually. The court's decision, expected by June, may redefine U.S. birthright citizenship policy, aligning with or against Trump's aggressive immigration stance.

(With inputs from agencies.)