Iran Denounces US Strikes Amid Fragile Ceasefire Talks

Iran criticized US military strikes as ceasefire violations during ongoing negotiations to end the conflict. The ceasefire, centered on the Strait of Hormuz, has faced challenges as Tehran leverages its strategic position. US-led efforts also seek broader diplomatic engagements involving Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Israel.

Iran Denounces US Strikes Amid Fragile Ceasefire Talks
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.

Iran on Tuesday denounced US strikes a day earlier as a sign of "bad faith and unreliability" as negotiations continue toward a possible deal to end the war.

The US military has characterised Monday's strikes in southern Iran as defensive, saying targets included missile launch sites and boats placing mines, and said the US acted with "restraint" in light of the weekslong ceasefire.

Iran's foreign ministry called the strikes a ceasefire violation and warned that Washington would bear responsibility for "all consequences", without details.

"The Islamic Republic of Iran will leave no act of aggression unanswered," it added in a statement.

Iran's Revolutionary Guard on Tuesday said it had shot down and deterred drones and a fighter jet that entered its airspace, according to Iran's official Mizan news agency, which did not specify when the incident occurred.

It wasn't immediately clear what the developments would mean for negotiations. The strikes came after Iranian parliament speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf went to Qatar as part of the talks, which US President Donald Trump said Monday were "proceeding nicely".

The strikes were the latest flare-up in the fragile ceasefire that began April 7 and has largely held.

Negotiations centre in part on the Strait of Hormuz, the crucial waterway off southern Iran through which a fifth of the world's crude oil and natural gas passed before the war began with US-Israeli strikes in February. Tehran retaliated by effectively closing the strait, stranding hundreds of ships and shocking the global economy.

The strait has become a powerful lever for Tehran in talks, joining the long-running issue of Iran's nuclear programme and highly enriched uranium. Iran in turn wants the US to lift its military blockade of Iranian ports that began on April 17.

The strait also is cause for growing concern as supplies of fertilizer are also badly affected for vulnerable global farmers.

"What we are witnessing today is not only a geopolitical crisis, it is a systemic shock to the global agrifood system," the director-general of the UN's Food and Agriculture Organization, Qu Dongyu, said Tuesday.

Trump has introduced a new angle in negotiations for a deal on the war, saying any agreement to end the war should include a requirement for several additional countries, including Saudi Arabia and Pakistan, to join the Abraham Accords, a series of US-brokered diplomatic, economic and security agreements aimed at normalising relations with Israel.

Bahrain and the United Arab Emirates became the first countries to join in 2020; Sudan, Morocco and Kazakhstan have followed. Egypt and Jordan already formally recognize Israel and have long-standing peace treaties. Turkey first recognised Israel in 1949.

Israel's conduct against Palestinians, including in the war against Hamas in the Gaza Strip, has alienated Gulf Arab states and the wider Muslim world, but Trump has been keen to build on the Abraham Accords, forged during his first term. He even has suggested that Iran eventually could sign on.

TRENDING

OPINION / BLOG / INTERVIEW

Trade friction drives AI adoption and better innovation outcomes

Generative AI is reorganizing the job ladder, with junior and senior roles changing differently

Responsible AI governance must confront misalignment between values and outcomes

AI in higher education: GenAI overuse may deskill future graduates

DevShots

Latest News

Connect us on

LinkedIn Quora Youtube RSS
Give Feedback