Big Bang Theory hypothesis may not be entirely correct, claims Hawking's mate

That's what scientists bet on Roger Penrose's team, who worked with such great physicists as Stephen Hawking.

The way we learn how our universe began, following the Big Bang Theory hypothesis, may not be entirely correct. Some scientists defend the possibility that everything we know may be part of a great cosmic cycle of life where universes are born and die.

That's what scientists bet on Roger Penrose's team, who worked with such great physicists as Stephen Hawking. Together, they have laid the groundwork for all future research on black holes and the Penrose-Hawking Singularity Termas, arguing that other universes similar to ours may be related to the action of black holes.

On Aug. 6, Penrose and his team published the article Apparent evidence for Hawking points in the CMB Sky dedicated to Hawking's memory. In it, scientists approach a specific type of cosmic radiation, which Hawking had previously predicted, similar to what one would expect to find in a black hole, but with nothing to cause gravitational attraction. The absence of gravity was theorized by the pair as an indication that the radiation would precede the Big Bang.

As a kid, the radiation found could be a kind of signal left behind by some black hole that spent billions of years channeling energy from a dying universe, only to later take it to a baby universe that is ours. According to the scientists, they are striking evidence of a theory called Conformed Cyclic Cosmology, which states that the universe constantly repeats itself through big bangs.

It would work like this, a universe is created by means of a big bang and begins to expand, probably filling up with stars and stars that eventually will gravitate to collapse, generating deformations in the space-time mesh. When this universe becomes old and full of black holes, it turns into a gigantic mass-free goo that evaporates into electrons. Finally, the weightless cluster collapses into itself, forming a big bang that will give birth to a new universe. This would be repeated from time to time, forever and ever.

The research did not find enough data to confirm the Theory of Conformed Cyclic Cosmology, but one of today's most respected physicists believes that inflated universe theory is no longer able to explain our reality.