Meta Triumphs Over Antitrust Battle: FTC Faces Setback
Meta Platforms, the parent company of Facebook, won a significant legal battle against the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, which had aimed to break up its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. A U.S. federal judge ruled that Meta does not hold a social media monopoly, delivering a blow to the FTC's antitrust efforts.
A U.S. federal judge has ruled in favor of Meta Platforms, undermining the Federal Trade Commission's attempt to dismantle the tech giant's acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. Judge James Boasberg concluded that Meta does not harbor a social media monopoly, marking a significant win for Meta.
The court's decision casts a shadow over the FTC's ongoing campaign against Big Tech, highlighting competitive pressures from other platforms like TikTok and YouTube. The ruling illustrates the complexity of regulating rapidly evolving tech landscapes and has impeded the antitrust momentum initiated under President Donald Trump's administration.
This decision is set against a backdrop of multiple high-profile legal challenges to Big Tech companies, including ongoing cases against Alphabet's Google and Apple. Questions have been raised regarding Judge Boasberg's decisions, stirring political controversy, as some lawmakers call for his impeachment.
(With inputs from agencies.)
- READ MORE ON:
- Meta
- FTC
- antitrust
- social media
- technology
- Big Tech
- competition
- judge ruling
ALSO READ
Call for Regulations: Safeguarding Children on Social Media
India's Leap in Maritime Innovation: A New Era in Defense Technology
Oprah Winfrey praises Australia's social media ban for children
EU to launch antitrust probe into Meta over use of AI in WhatsApp, FT reports
UPDATE 1-Australia says the world will follow social media ban as Meta starts blocking teens

