Consensual sex between live-in partners not rape in certain cases: SC

"There may be a case where where the prosecutrix agrees to have sexual intercourse on account of her love and passion for the accused and not solely on account of misconception created by accused, or where an accused on account of circumstance which he could not have foreseen or which were beyond his control, was unable to marry her despite having every intention to do so. Such cases must be treated differently," the bench said. The court said this while quashing an FIR lodged against a doctor by a Maharashtra based nurse who were, for quite some time, in a live-in relationship.
Pointing to clear distinction between rape and consensual sex between live-in partners, the court said, "The courts, in such cases must very carefully examine whether the complainant had actually wanted to marry the victim or had mala fide motives and had made a false promise to this effect only to satisfy his lust, as the later falls within the ambit of cheating or deception."
ALSO READ
- UPDATE 1-Mueller eyes Manafort meeting with Russian partner in 2016 -court filing
- Pelicans hold onto Davis, will put him back on court
- UPDATE 1-U.S. Supreme Court blocks restrictive Louisiana abortion law
- UPDATE 2-U.S. Supreme Court blocks restrictive Louisiana abortion law
- Developers lose court appeal to build coal mine in Australia's Hunter Valley