Are Diet Soft Drinks Really Worth the Risk?

Although diet soft drinks are seen as a healthier alternative, concerns arise regarding their long-term health impacts, including heart disease and possible carcinogenic properties of artificial sweeteners like aspartame. Experts propose moderate consumption and alternative beverages to adjust taste preferences gradually.


Devdiscourse News Desk | Toowoomba | Updated: 12-11-2025 12:37 IST | Created: 12-11-2025 12:37 IST
Are Diet Soft Drinks Really Worth the Risk?
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • Australia

The average Australian consumes nearly 60 litres of soft drink annually, with many opting for diet versions as a seemingly healthier choice. Yet, experts caution that while diet drinks have less sugar, they may not be entirely risk-free.

A standard can of Coca-Cola contains about seven teaspoons of sugar, nearing the World Health Organisation's recommended daily sugar intake. In contrast, Diet Coke replaces sugar with artificial sweeteners, such as aspartame, which the WHO recently classified as possibly carcinogenic.

Regular consumption of diet soft drinks has been correlated with higher incidences of heart disease and type 2 diabetes. As per WHO guidance, artificial sweeteners consumption is generally safe within limits but emerging evidence points to potential gut irritation issues. Individuals are advised to explore alternative beverages like infused water or unsweetened iced tea.

(With inputs from agencies.)

Give Feedback