Supreme Court Mandates Strict Tree Protection in Highway Projects

The Supreme Court has emphasized the constitutional duty to protect trees, instructing public authorities to avoid unnecessary felling when possible. While reviewing a plea from the NHAI over a highway project in the Taj Trapezium Zone, the court suggested stringent conditions, including compensatory afforestation.

Supreme Court Mandates Strict Tree Protection in Highway Projects
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

The Supreme Court reinforced its stance on environmental preservation, highlighting the constitutional responsibility of protecting trees. Public authorities must avoid excessive tree felling, as evidenced in a recent hearing concerning a highway development in the Taj Trapezium Zone.

Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan criticized the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) for its proposal to cut more trees than necessary, despite needing only 650 of the 850 trees marked for removal.

The court mandated that NHAI must meet compensatory afforestation requirements as part of any permission to proceed, ensuring a commitment to environmental sustainability alongside infrastructure projects.

Give Feedback

Use this form for editorial or site feedback. We usually reply within 2 to 3 working days.

By submitting, you agree that we may use your email address to respond.