Supreme Court Shields Its Integrity Amid Controversy
The Supreme Court declined to entertain a PIL against BJP MP Nishikant Dubey for remarks critical of the judiciary. Dubey accused the Supreme Court and CJI Sanjiv Khanna of leading the country towards anarchy. The court emphasized preserving its dignity while addressing the petitioner's concerns.

- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court on Monday decided not to entertain a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking contempt action against BJP MP Nishikant Dubey for his alleged derogatory remarks about the apex court and Chief Justice of India (CJI) Sanjiv Khanna.
Dubey, who represents Godda constituency in Jharkhand, created controversy by stating that the Supreme Court is pushing the country towards anarchy and blaming CJI Khanna for civil unrest in India. These remarks were condemned by the Supreme Court Bar Association and labeled as contemptuous.
The bench led by CJI said they will issue a brief order but will not entertain the PIL. The plea filed stressed the necessity of protecting the dignity of the Supreme Court and its judges and urged the use of punitive measures under Article 129 of the Constitution for contempt.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Integrity on Trial: Upholding Trust in the Judiciary System
Indian Judiciary Champions Sustainability at Climate Change Conference 2025
India's Stern Stance: Pakistan Criticized by BJP MP on International Tour
Balancing Justice and Tech: CJI Gavai's Vision of Accessible Judiciary
High Court Holds Sahibganj Collector in Contempt Over Unauthorized Ghat Auction