Delhi Court Acquits Accused and Initiates Perjury Action Against False Complainant

A Delhi court acquits a man accused of rape and orders perjury proceedings against the complainant for fabricating a false story. The ruling reveals contradictions in the complainant's statements and prior actions to entrap the accused. The case underscores the impact of false accusations on real victims and the justice system.

A Delhi court has acquitted a man wrongfully accused of rape and has initiated perjury proceedings against the complainant, citing a 'mendacious story' fabricated by her. Presiding over the case, Additional Sessions Judge Anuj Agrawal stated that false accusations place an excessive burden on the judicial system and harm actual victims.

The court's decision highlighted discrepancies and evidence that contradicted the complainant's allegations, including her previous marriages and suspicious activities with other accused individuals. Despite being arrested for rape and related charges, the accused was found innocent due to lack of technical or scientific evidence against him.

The judgment calls attention to the potential collusion between the complainant and certain police officials aimed at extorting money from the accused. Judge Agrawal has requested the Delhi Police commissioner investigate the matter to uphold justice and address any misuse of power by the authorities involved.

(With inputs from agencies.)