Courtroom Clash: New York's Win Against Federal Immigration Mandate

A federal judge dismissed the Trump administration's lawsuit against New York's law that prohibits federal immigration arrests at state courthouses without a judicial warrant. Citing the 10th Amendment, the decision affirms state autonomy in not enforcing federal immigration laws. New York's Attorney General views it as a protection for immigrant rights.

In a significant legal ruling, a federal judge has dismissed a lawsuit brought by the Trump administration against New York's immigration policies. The decision, handed down by US District Judge Mae D'Agostino, supports New York's law preventing federal authorities from making immigration arrests in state courthouses without a judge-signed warrant.

The case challenged the Protect Our Courts Act, a law passed in response to enforcement actions during President Trump's term, and argued by the Department of Justice as unconstitutional. However, the judge upheld the law based on the 10th Amendment, which protects states from federal overreach in enforcing civil immigration laws.

Reacting to the ruling, New York Attorney General Letitia James expressed her support, stating the decision ensures everyone can access state courts without fear of federal intervention. The Justice Department, however, remains committed to defending President Trump's immigration enforcement priorities in court.

(With inputs from agencies.)