Minnesota State Showdown: Immigration vs. Fraud Prevention

As Minnesota's legislative session begins, Democrats aim to limit federal immigration officers' powers, while Republicans focus on fraud prevention. The session finds a closely divided House and Senate, making bipartisan compromise essential. Meanwhile, journalists and activists plead not guilty to civil rights charges in a protest case.

The Minnesota legislative session kicks off with Democrats seeking to limit federal immigration officers' authority, while Republicans focus on combating fraud in taxpayer-funded programs. The session opens amid tensions, further fueled by looming elections and a tightly divided Legislature, with bipartisan support necessary to pass any significant changes.

Security at the state Capitol has tightened following last summer's assassination of former House Speaker Melissa Hortman, with Democrats proposing bills to restrict ICE activities, particularly concerning schools, hospitals, and other public spaces. Despite Democratic efforts, Republicans are unenthusiastic about challenging federal authorities, aiming instead to bolster fraud prevention measures.

In other news, Minnesota journalist Georgia Fort and activist Trahern Crews plead not guilty to charges stemming from a protest at a church, where an ICE official was pastor. The case highlights ongoing media and civil rights tensions in the state, particularly over freedom of the press issues.

(With inputs from agencies.)