Pakistan’s Interior Minister Sanaullah warns of governor's rule in Opposition-ruled Punjab province

PTI | Islamabad | Updated: 27-07-2022 18:17 IST | Created: 27-07-2022 17:59 IST
Pakistan’s Interior Minister Sanaullah warns of governor's rule in Opposition-ruled Punjab province
Representative Image Image Credit: ANI
  • Country:
  • Pakistan

Pakistan's Interior Minister Rana Sanaullah on Wednesday warned of imposing governor's rule in Punjab if his entry into the province was restricted, a day after the Supreme Court declared former premier Imran Khan-backed candidate Pervez Elahi as the chief minister.

Elahi took oath as the chief minister of Pakistan's Punjab province following the apex court's verdict that saw Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) Hamza Shehbaz, son of prime minister Shehbaz Sharif, losing his status of the ''trustee'' chief minister. "The summary to impose governor's rule is being drafted, and I — personally — have started work on it,'' Interior Minister Sanaullah said while addressing a press conference in Islamabad. "If my entry is restricted, it will be grounds for governor's rule," he asserted, after Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) lawmakers had suggested prohibiting his entry to the Punjab province. In the widely anticipated judgment on a petition filed by Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid (PML-Q) leader Elahi, the apex court on Tuesday declared Deputy Speaker Dost Muhammad Mazari's controversial decision to reject 10 votes in the Punjab chief minister's election as "illegal", citing Article 63-A of the Constitution.

Hamza was earlier declared the winner in the election though his Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) party did not have a majority in the Assembly after key by-elections held on July 17.

Sanaullah said the Supreme Court's decision had "created complications and destabilized the political situation" because of which the rupee was plummeting against the US dollar and the economy in a tailspin. "Even a second-grader would interpret Article 63-A — which is related to the disqualification of lawmakers over defection — as saying that the votes of dissident lawmakers would be counted in the election," the minister said. He added that the apex court's verdict contradicted the Election Commission of Pakistan's decision to de-seat 25 dissident PTI lawmakers who had voted for Hamza in the April 16 election, which was, in turn, based on the Supreme Court order. Hamza should have remained the chief minister since the votes of those 25 dissident lawmakers would not be subtracted from his tally in the April election, Sanaullah said. "It is my opinion that the interpretation of Article 63-A will not sustain. Any lawyer will say it amounts to rewriting the Constitution. It is not the Supreme Court's authority to rewrite the Constitution and we will defend the parliament's authority," he explained. "This situation is unfortunate and we want to restrict our words […] An independent, uncontroversial and impartial judiciary is any country's basic need. No country can progress without it," the minister said. Punjab is Pakistan's second-largest province and any party ruling the key province controls the politics of the country.

For the PML-N, losing Punjab means losing the Centre. Political pundits believe that the ruling coalition is now vulnerable.

Tuesday's outcome provides a ''massive opportunity'' to PTI chairman Khan to build further pressure on the rulers to call for fresh elections and also corner the PML-N in Punjab which is considered a stronghold of the Sharifs. When asked whether the PML-N-led coalition government in Islamabad would find it difficult to continue after losing control of the Punjab province, Sanaullah said: "The federal government has its own role. It is present everywhere.'' ''This kind of conversation is being done by people who neither have intelligence nor knowledge. The federal government is a coalition government and it is present everywhere,'' he added. Meanwhile, PML-N Vice President Maryam Nawaz also criticized the court's decision and termed it "judicial murder". "How will you justify this blatant injustice? This is judicial murder but the victim this time is justice. What have you done, chief justice?" she said in a tweet.

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)

Give Feedback