High-Stakes Legal Clash: Activist's Detention Tests Trump Immigration Policy

A federal court will determine the fate of Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia student and Palestinian activist, highlighting a conflict over Trump's immigration policy. Khalil, accused by Trump of supporting pro-terrorist activities, faces deportation despite no formal charges. The case questions the balance between free speech and national security.

A legal battle is unfolding in federal court over Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia University student and Palestinian activist, whose case has become a focal point of the Trump administration's immigration policy. Khalil has been accused by President Trump of supporting Hamas, although there are no formal charges or evidence to support this claim.

U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman blocked Khalil's deportation and scheduled a hearing, while government lawyers argue the judge lacks authority to resolve the case. This contentious case probes the boundary between protected free speech and alleged support for terrorist organizations amid Trump's deportation directives targeted at foreign students linked to pro-Palestinian protests.

Khalil's arrest has ignited protests in Manhattan, with condemnations from lawmakers and activists, who view it as an infringement on civil liberties. As a lawful permanent resident, Khalil holds constitutional protections, and any deportation would require substantial evidence. Legal experts note that lengthy appeals could delay resolution for years.

(With inputs from agencies.)