Unprecedented Deportation Saga: Kilmar Abrego's Struggle Against Immigration Crackdown
Kilmar Abrego, once wrongfully deported to El Salvador, faces a new threat of removal to Uganda as his legal battle continues. Arrested in Baltimore, Abrego contests charges of transporting migrants and denies gang affiliations. His case highlights tension between immigration enforcement and constitutional due process under the Trump administration.
Kilmar Abrego, thrust into the spotlight as a symbol of stringent immigration policies, confronts another deportation threat after his arrest by U.S. officers in Baltimore. Now, plans for his removal to Uganda raise significant legal questions and concerns about due process in handling immigration cases.
Abrego's legal team argues that the Trump administration is leveraging deportation threats as a tactic to secure a guilty plea on charges related to migrant transport. They emphasize the absence of due process and the unprecedented nature of sending him to a country with which he has no ties.
Judge Paula Xinis halted any immediate deportation proceedings until further reviews, questioning government assurances about Abrego's safety if deported. Abrego's case continues to draw attention to the broader implications of executive power and immigration policy under the Trump administration.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Uganda’s Election Becomes a Test Case for Digital Repression as UN Warns of Escalating Crackdown Ahead of January Polls
Ugandan Election: Democracy Under Siege?
UN Experts Warn Uganda’s Digital and Security Crackdown Threatens 2026 Elections
Bobi Wine's Battle for Change: The Struggle Against Uganda's Political Repression
Uganda opposition candidate says he will review oil deals if elected next week

