BMC Elections Ink Controversy Sparks Political Storm in Maharashtra

The BMC elections turned contentious as opposition leaders alleged that indelible ink used during voting could be easily erased, casting doubt on the electoral process. The State Election Commission refuted these claims, maintaining the integrity of the ink. The controversy has fueled political tensions in Maharashtra.

The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) elections witnessed a significant dispute as allegations emerged over the removability of "indelible" ink used to mark voters. Uddhav Thackeray of Shiv Sena UBT and Raj Thackeray of MNS raised concerns over the ink's effectiveness, claiming it could be easily erased.

The State Election Commission (SEC), however, rejected these allegations, affirming the ink's quality and durability. Maharashtra State Election Commissioner DT Waghmare defended the integrity of the ink, asserting that there were no irregularities in the polling process. He noted attempts to create confusion regarding the ink's use, underscoring that the ink was the same type used in past elections by India's Election Commission.

Despite these reassurances, accusations from Uddhav Thackeray persisted, suggesting collusion between the ruling Mahayuti coalition and the SEC. He claimed the ink could be removed with common substances like nail polish remover, allowing multiple votes. On the other side, Maharashtra's Chief Minister and Deputy Chief Minister stood by the SEC's stance, ensuring a free and fair electoral process.

(With inputs from agencies.)