Supreme Court Stays Delhi High Court's Verdict on Mandatory Attendance in Law Colleges
The Indian Supreme Court has temporarily stayed a Delhi High Court ruling that discouraged barring students from exams due to attendance shortfalls, noting the current frameworks cause issues for national law universities. The notice was issued as the case awaits further examination.
- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court intervened on Tuesday by staying the Delhi High Court ruling that stopped law colleges from preventing students with low attendance from taking their exams. The apex court noted that many national law universities are experiencing difficulties due to this judgment.
Justices Vikram Nath and Sandeep Mehta heard appeals, including one from the Bar Council of India (BCI), challenging the high court's November 2025 decision. They decided to put the ruling on hold while discussions continue, scheduled next for July 21.
The Supreme Court maintained that other high courts can decide similar petitions and raised concerns, asking why the BCI delayed their challenge. The court emphasized the need for mandatory attendance norms, highlighting the broader implications for legal education's quality in India.
ALSO READ
-
Delhi High Court Offers Fresh Review on Sajjan Kumar Acquittal in Riots Case
-
Delhi High Court Grants Interim Bail to Engineer Rashid for Father's Rituals
-
Supreme Court Questions Wetlands Rules: Is Definition Too Vague?
-
Delhi High Court Reserves Verdict on Athar Khan's Bail Plea in Delhi Riots Case
-
Supreme Court Demands Action on ITAT Vacancies
Google News