Supreme Court Weighs on Corruption Probes: Balancing Fearless Governance and Judicial Oversight

The Supreme Court of India is deliberating the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, which mandates prior approval before investigating government officials for corruption. The provision is designed to promote 'fearless governance' by preventing harassment of honest officials, while maintaining accountability.

The Supreme Court of India is weighing the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, which stipulates that prior approval is required to launch an investigation against government officials suspected of corruption.

The government argues that this requirement ensures 'fearless governance' by safeguarding honest officials while maintaining accountability. However, critics claim it could hinder anti-corruption efforts.

Statistics presented in court revealed that of the 2,395 corruption complaints received since 2018, approval to investigate was granted in 60% of cases. Legal experts debated the need for guidelines to balance the protection of honest officials and the pursuit of corrupt ones during the hearing.

(With inputs from agencies.)