Supreme Court Order on Stray Dogs Stirs Debate

The Supreme Court's order to relocate stray dogs from Delhi-NCR has caused a divide between residents and animal activists. While some view it as a solution to dog bite incidents, others argue that the lack of resources and infrastructure makes the task impractical and potentially harmful to the dogs.

The Supreme Court's directive to relocate stray dogs from the Delhi-NCR region has sparked controversy, with a range of opinions emerging from the local community. Residents' Welfare Associations have welcomed the move, citing frequent dog bite incidents, but animal rights activists have voiced concerns over the feasibility of the initiative.

Former Union minister Vijay Goel praised the order, viewing it as support for his long-standing demand to remove stray dogs from public spaces. However, animal activists have criticized the decision as unrealistic, highlighting the lack of land and funds to execute such an extensive operation.

Critics, such as the Umeed for Animals Foundation, argue that the Supreme Court's decision does not consider the long-term implications for dogs and risks worsening the human-dog conflict. They stress the need for proper infrastructure, funding, and alternative solutions like sterilization drives instead of mass relocation.

(With inputs from agencies.)