Cybercrime Treaty Sparks Debate Over Human Rights Implications

A U.N. cybercrime agreement, aimed at curbing global economic losses from cyber offences, faces criticism over potential human rights violations. While set to be signed in Hanoi, questions arise regarding Vietnam's role given its human rights record. Critics are wary of the pact facilitating data exchange and endangering freedom of expression.

The global stage is set for a contentious U.N. cybercrime treaty, as delegates from various nations prepare to sign the agreement in Hanoi this weekend. The convention, designed to curtail cyber offences costing trillions, faces scrutiny over potential human rights abuses embedded within its framework.

The treaty's language has drawn criticism from activists, tech giants, and human rights bodies, who caution against its facilitation of data sharing and its impact on freedom of expression. Despite these concerns, the European Union and Canada have committed to signing, citing human rights safeguards.

Vietnam's selection as host has ignited debate, with critics questioning its suitability because of its human rights issues. The U.N. maintains that the treaty includes provisions to protect rights, but concerns persist around its impact on ethical hackers and the potential ease of extraditing government critics.

(With inputs from agencies.)