Supreme Court Decision Raises Concerns Over Governors' Powers
The CPI(M) criticized the Supreme Court's decision stating that it supports governors' extra-constitutional powers. It expressed concern over governors acting as political agents of the Centre, highlighting the threat to state rights due to centralization. The court's opinion lacks constitutional checks on governors' powers.
- Country:
- India
The Communist Party of India (Marxist) voiced dissatisfaction with the Supreme Court's recent decision regarding the extent of governors' powers. The party warned that this judicial stance may further embolden governors to exercise powers beyond the constitutional framework in states governed by the opposition.
The court's advisory opinion refrained from setting any deadlines for governors or the President to approve bills passed by state assemblies. However, it clarified that governors do not have absolute authority, preventing them from indefinitely withholding assent to such bills.
The Left party pointed out that the Supreme Court's decision does not include the necessary constitutional checks to curb the seemingly arbitrary behaviors of governors, who are portrayed as acting under the influence of the central government.
ALSO READ
-
Supreme Court to Hear Meenakshi Natarajan's Challenge on RS Nomination Rejection
-
Detained Palestinian Doctor Sparks Outrage at Israel's Supreme Court
-
Supreme Court Recognizes Homemakers as 'Nation Builders', Sets New Compensation Norm
-
Supreme Court Overturns Twitter Employee's Conviction for Spy Case
-
Supreme Court Faces Contentious Cases in Crucial Term
Google News