Trump's Hush Money Conviction Controversy: Juror Misconduct Allegations Emerge

Donald Trump's conviction related to hush money paid to a porn star faces allegations of juror misconduct, though details remain redacted. Questions about the fairness of the trial are being raised by Trump's legal team, while prosecutors argue the claims lack evidence. Trump's conviction marked the first time such a verdict was rendered against a U.S. president.

Lawyers for President-elect Donald Trump have claimed juror misconduct in his criminal conviction case involving hush money payments to a porn star, though much of their court filing remains redacted.

Judge Juan Merchan acknowledged the allegations, filed anonymously, emphasizing the risk of public disclosure, as the Manhattan District Attorney criticized the defense for providing 'vague' allegations insufficient to warrant further investigation.

The controversy centers on charges of falsifying business records related to a $130,000 payment by Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen to Stormy Daniels, prompting both legal teams to deliberate the implications for Trump's upcoming presidential term.

(With inputs from agencies.)