Unmasking the Epstein Files: A Shift Towards Survivor-Centered Journalism

The unfolding Epstein Files story prompts a critical examination of journalistic practices, particularly in covering sexual violence cases. It challenges traditional norms that focus on powerful figures, advocating instead for a survivor-centered approach to highlight the voices and experiences of those affected rather than sensationalized headlines.

The Jeffrey Epstein saga continues to evolve with a new phase unfolding as a federal judge has approved the release of grand jury transcripts and other evidence related to Epstein and his associate Ghislaine Maxwell's sex trafficking case. This comes under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, which mandates the release of almost all Epstein-related files by December 19.

While traditional media focuses on the identification of high-powered elites connected to Epstein, an increasing number of outlets are shifting towards a survivor-centered approach, featuring stories of those directly affected. This change reflects the broader impact of the #MeToo movement, emphasizing the voices of survivors over those of the powerful figures implicated.

However, the longstanding journalistic norms emphasizing conflict and scandal continue to dominate, often sidelining the nuanced experiences of victims. This raises ethical and editorial questions about newsworthiness and the importance of telling stories centered on the individuals whose lives were most impacted by the abuse.

(With inputs from agencies.)