U.S. Rejects WHO Amendments Aimed at Pandemic Preparedness
The U.S. has rejected WHO's 2024 amendments enhancing pandemic preparedness. The amendments, introducing a 'pandemic emergency' category to bolster defenses against new pathogens, were deemed vague and expanding WHO's authorities unnecessarily. The decision highlights concerns over national sovereignty versus global health cooperation during crises.
The United States has officially rejected amendments to the World Health Organization's legally binding health rules aimed at better preparing for future pandemics. A joint statement from the Department of State and Department of Health and Human Services confirmed the U.S. rejection of the 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulations, which were adopted by consensus last year.
The amendments had introduced a 'pandemic emergency' category for significant global health threats to improve the world's defenses against new pathogens. The U.S. criticized the development process for lacking public input and argued that the amendments unnecessarily expand WHO's role in public health emergencies, potentially politicizing international responses.
Despite the rejection, a parallel pandemic pact adopted in May aims to ensure global access to medications during a crisis, requiring drug manufacturers to allocate a portion of vaccines and medicines to WHO. The U.S., however, will not be bound by this pact following its withdrawal from the WHO, emphasizing the protection of national sovereignty in health policy decisions.
(With inputs from agencies.)
- READ MORE ON:
- U.S.
- WHO
- pandemic
- amendments
- health
- sovereignty
- COVID-19
- regulations
- global
- emergency
ALSO READ
Mauritius Asserts Sovereignty Over Chagos Archipelago
Trump's Policy Push: Housing, Credit, and Healthcare Reforms Under Scrutiny
CCI Greenlights Major Stake Acquisition Deals in Banking and Healthcare
Macron Champions EU Sovereignty: A Call for Growth and Stability
UN Secretary-General Cancels Davos Appearance Due to Health

