Should a Teen be Tried as an Adult for 'Heinous' Act in Pune?

The prosecution is pushing for a 17-year-old to be tried as an adult for allegedly causing deaths while driving intoxicated in Pune. The incident brought national attention, and the Juvenile Justice Board is yet to decide. Legal battles continue with contrasting interpretations of 'heinous' crime.

The Juvenile Justice Board is facing pressure from the prosecution to treat a 17-year-old accused of driving a Porsche while intoxicated, resulting in the death of two individuals, as an adult. The tragic incident occurred on May 19 last year in Pune, causing national concern.

The case has been stuck for over a year, with the Pune police's plea still pending. Special public prosecutor Shishir Hiray emphasized the 'heinous' nature of the act, alleging tampering of evidence, to argue for an adult trial.

The defense, led by lawyer Prashant Patil, countered by referencing the Supreme Court's judgement on what constitutes a 'heinous' act, arguing that the plea contradicts this guideline. They highlight a lack of sections mandating a minimum seven-year punishment.

(With inputs from agencies.)