State Attorneys Challenge Federal Funding Cuts in Lawsuit

Attorneys general from over 20 states have filed a federal lawsuit against the Trump administration challenging funding cuts. The lawsuit aims to limit the administration's ability to cancel programmes using an obscure federal clause. The lawsuit highlights the administration's 'slash-and-burn campaign' to terminate grants crucial for state programmes.

A coalition of attorneys general from more than 20 states, including Washington, D.C., filed a federal lawsuit on Tuesday against the Trump administration. The legal action challenges recent funding cuts that affect diverse sectors ranging from crime prevention to scientific research.

Filed in a Boston court, the lawsuit seeks to curtail the administration's reliance on a little-known federal regulation clause to rescind grants that do not align with its priorities. The suit argues that this clause has been used since January to cancel entire programs, impacting thousands of grants initially awarded to states and various grantees.

Key figures in the lawsuit, such as Rhode Island Attorney General Neronha, claim the move disrupts essential state services. Some states have previously succeeded in legal actions against these cuts, with this lawsuit being one of the broadest yet. The White House's Office of Management and Budget has yet to respond to the suit.

(With inputs from agencies.)