U.S. Military's Controversial Strike: A Test of Trump's Policies on Drug Cartels

The U.S. military's destruction of a vessel allegedly carrying drugs is raising concerns among lawmakers. The operation aimed to disrupt drug trafficking by equating it with terrorism. This shift in policy, made without explicit Congressional authorization, has sparked debate about military use against non-traditional threats.

The recent U.S. military operation which targeted and destroyed a vessel allegedly transporting drugs to international waters near Venezuela has ignited a firestorm of controversy. Lawmakers are pressing for more clarity on the legal justifications backing President Trump's military strategy.

This unprecedented act is part of a broader campaign that has so far wiped out over 20 boats, resulting in over 80 casualties. The strategy equates drug trafficking with terrorism, a perspective that permits the use of military force, raising eyebrows for bypassing traditional law enforcement roles.

This legal maneuvre, not explicitly sanctioned by Congress, challenges established military engagement protocols and has sparked intense scrutiny and calls for public disclosure of the administration's underlying legal arguments.

(With inputs from agencies.)