Railway Scandal: CBI Defends Case Against Lalu Prasad Yadav
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) opposes Lalu Prasad Yadav's petition to dismiss an FIR in the land-for-jobs scam, arguing that he had no official role in the railway appointments. The case involves alleged exchanges of land for jobs during Lalu's tenure as railway minister.
- Country:
- India
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) staunchly opposed Lalu Prasad Yadav's petition to quash its FIR concerning the contentious land-for-jobs scam. The CBI, represented by Solicitor General S V Raju, argued that Yadav had no decisive role in railway appointments, asserting that these appointments fell within the jurisdiction of general managers.
Justice Ravinder Dudeja presided over the proceedings, where it was stated that no prior sanction was necessary under section 17A of the Prevention of Corruption Act, as Lalu Prasad Yadav's actions did not align with his official duties. The RJD leader's legal team argued that the FIR, registered 14 years post the purported scam, lacked legal standing.
The CBI case harks back to Group D appointments in the West Central Zone of Indian Railways, allegedly in exchange for lands during Yadav's ministerial tenure. As the legal battle continues, the high court anticipates further hearings next week, amid claims of political retaliation against the former railway minister.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Justice BV Nagarathna says Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act is unconstitutional, needs to be struck down.
Requirement of prior sanction is contrary to Prevention of Corruption Act; forecloses inquiry and protects corrupt: Justice Nagarathna.
Justice KV Viswanathan holds Section 17A of Prevention of Corruption Act constitutional, stresses need to protect honest officers.
Railway Minister Ashwini Vaishnaw announces 52 reforms in 52 weeks for 2026
Railway Minister Vaishnaw rolls out 52 reforms in 52 weeks in 2026; focusing on safety, AI and passenger services

