EXPLAINER: Biden inaction, mixed signals on death penalty

In a Tuesday filing, federal prosecutors said they wont seek it for Patrick Crusius, a 24-year-old accused of fatally shooting nearly two dozen people in a racist attack at a West Texas Walmart in 2019.Advocates for abolishing capital punishment say mixed signals from the administration and silence from Biden the first president to have openly opposed the death penalty -- drives home that the Democrat has not made good on his campaign promises that so raised their hopes.

In Boston, the Justice Department is pressing judges to uphold Marathon bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev's death sentence. In New York, it's asking jurors to impose the death penalty on a man who killed eight people in an attack on a bicycle path. President Joe Biden campaigned on a pledge to work toward abolishing federal capital punishment but has taken no major steps to that end, though the Justice Department has imposed a moratorium that means no federal executions are likely to happen anytime soon. The department continues to press for the death penalty in certain cases but not in others. In a Tuesday filing, federal prosecutors said they won't seek it for Patrick Crusius, a 24-year-old accused of fatally shooting nearly two dozen people in a racist attack at a West Texas Walmart in 2019.

Advocates for abolishing capital punishment say mixed signals from the administration and silence from Biden — the first president to have openly opposed the death penalty -- drives home that the Democrat has not made good on his campaign promises that so raised their hopes. Others say his inaction makes it likely a future president will resume federal executions as President Donald Trump did in 2020 after a 17-year hiatus. The spree of 13 executions at a prison death chamber in Terre Haute, Indiana, during his last six months in office meant Trump oversaw more federal executions than any president in over 120 years.

"The Biden administration appears to have no understanding that inaction, if it continues, will result in executions," said Robert Dunham, who heads the nonpartisan Death Penalty Information Center in Washington, DC. "The Biden administration executions will be carried out by a future administration. But they will be Biden executions." Here's a look at the federal death penalty under Biden's administration: WHAT ABOUT ONGOING DEATH PENALTY CASES? Under Merrick Garland , the Justice Department hasn't sought the death penalty in any new cases. It also has withdrawn bids for capital punishment sought by prior administrations against more than two dozen defendants. But US prosecutors this month opened a capital trial in New York against Sayfullo Saipov, who is accused of using a truck in 2017 to mow down pedestrians and cyclists on a bike path by the Hudson River. The decision to seek death came under Trump but Garland allowed his prosecutors to continued to seek it. Justice Department lawyers are also fighting to maintain the death sentence imposed on Tsarnaev for the 2013 bombing that killed three people near the Boston Marathon finish line. Tsarnaev is making a renewed push to avoid execution after the US Supreme Court reinstated his death sentence last year. The White House didn't immediately respond to questions from The Associated Press. WHAT MEASURES HAS BIDEN TAKEN? Despite his campaign pledge, Biden himself has not issued any formal directives or policy statements on federal capital punishment. During the campaign, he also vowed to work at ending the death penalty in all states. He has been silent on that, too. The most notable step by his administration was Garland's 2021 announced halt on federal executions that were restarted by Biden's Republican predecessor. The Department of Justice won't issue orders to execute anyone, at least while the moratorium is in place. But it doesn't stop the department from pursuing the death penalty. And it doesn't stop US prosecutors from continuing to fight legal action by death row inmates trying to avoid execution. The Garland moratorium is similar to one ordered in 2014 by President Barack Obama following a botched state execution in Oklahoma. Capital punishment opponents say the fact Obama didn't take more far-reaching action on the federal executions left the door open for Trump to restart them.

Trump officials argued that carrying out the executions was a matter of complying with US law and bringing long delayed justice to victims' relatives. WHAT DOES THE REVIEW DURING THE MORATORIUM ENTAIL? The Justice Department hasn't offered details, including on end goals or timetables. When asked how long the moratorium may last, Department Spokesperson Joshua Stueve said in an email only that the review is ongoing. Garland has said the review would look at protocols put in place by Trump's attorney general, William Barr. Attorneys for death row inmates criticised the protocols, saying they allowed for hurried executions and undermined due process.

What the review does not entail is an assessment of whether the federal death penalty should be scrapped entirely. In September, the Justice Department issued a public notice seeking comment about changes to some Trump protocols, including one permitting execution methods other than lethal injection, including firing squads. HAVE ANY TRUMP-ERA PROTOCOLS BEEN REVOKED? None have not been formally rescinded, though they serve no practical function as long as the moratorium remains in place. In a recent letter, Democratic US Rep. Ayanna Pressley and Sen. Dick Durbin urged the Justice Department to quickly annul all the Trump protocols, including one authorising the use of state facilities and staff in federal executions, calling the orders "irreparably tainted.'' Another authorises the use of a single drug, pentobarbital, to replace a three-drug cocktail deployed in the earlier 2000s — the last time federal executions were carried out prior to Trump. A replacement was needed after pharmaceutical companies in the 2000s began prohibiting executioners from using their drugs, saying they were meant to save lives, not take them. The Barr Justice Department chose pentobarbital despite some evidence that pentobarbital causes pulmonary edema, a painful sensation akin to drowning as fluid rushes into the lungs.

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)