UPDATE 1-US judge blocks Pentagon's effort to punish Senator Mark Kelly

A U.S. judge blocked the Pentagon on Thursday from reducing Senator Mark Kelly's retired military rank and pension pay because he urged troops to reject unlawful orders. The preliminary ruling by U.S. ‌District Judge Richard Leon in Washington is the latest setback in court for President Donald Trump's historic campaign of vengeance against his perceived political enemies, which has drawn pushback from judges across the ideological spectrum. Kelly, a retired Navy captain and former astronaut who represents Arizona in the U.S. ‌Senate, was one of six congressional Democrats who appeared in a November video that reminded service members of their duty to ‌reject unlawful orders. In the clip, Kelly stated: "Our laws are clear: You can refuse illegal orders."

Leon, appointed by then-U.S. President George W. Bush in 2002, in his ruling said "the speech at issue here is unquestionably protected speech," describing the move to punish Kelly as a clear violation of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment. Kelly brought a lawsuit ⁠against the ​Trump administration to halt the censure.

"There ⁠is nothing 'routine' about defendants' actions here: punishing a sitting U.S. Senator for his views on military policy," Leon wrote. "It is a particularly valuable asset for our country to ⁠have retired veterans contributing to public discussion on military matters and policy." The Pentagon declined to comment and the White House did not immediately respond to ​a request for comment.

Kelly applauded the ruling, saying in a statement that "a federal court made clear that (U.S. Defense Secretary) Pete Hegseth ⁠violated the constitution when he tried to punish me for something I said." Kelly made his remarks in November as more Democrats were criticizing Trump's decisions to deploy the ⁠National ​Guard in U.S. cities and authorize lethal strikes on boats suspected of smuggling drugs from Latin America. The Republican president, in a social media post, called the video "SEDITIOUS BEHAVIOR, punishable by DEATH."

Hegseth issued a censure letter on January 5, asserting that Kelly had "clearly intended ⁠to undermine good order and military discipline" in violation of military rules that apply to both active and retired personnel. Trump administration lawyers had ⁠urged the judge to dismiss Kelly's ⁠lawsuit, calling it a "quintessential matter of military discipline not within the Judiciary's purview" in a recent court filing.

The Trump administration also called the lawsuit premature, saying Kelly has not yet been formally censured and ‌should have responded to ‌Hegseth's allegations through administrative channels. (Reporting By Jan Wolfe and Mike Scarcella; Editing ​by Bill Berkrot and Nia Williams)

(This story has not been edited by Devdiscourse staff and is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)