Republicans expected to abandon USD 1B security proposal for WH, Trump's ballroom

Senate Republican leaders are expected to drop a proposed USD 1 billion security funding for the White House complex due to opposition from some of their own party members.

Senate Republican leaders are expected to abandon a proposal for USD 1 billion in security money for the White House complex and President Donald Trump's ballroom on Thursday amid backlash from members of their own party.

Pressured by the White House, Republicans tried to add the money to a roughly USD 70 billion bill to restore funding to US Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Border Patrol.

But the security proposal met with opposition from some GOP lawmakers who are questioning the timing of the request, the high cost and how the taxpayer dollars would be used.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., acknowledged ''ongoing vote issues'' on Wednesday as leaders tried to measure Republican support and figure out what will be allowed in the bill under the chamber's rules.

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., told reporters Wednesday that the bill was ''back to square one'' without the security money because ''the votes are not there.''.

Thune hopes to pass the bill this week and send it to the House before leaving for a weeklong Memorial Day recess. But the bill's text has still not been released as leaders were wrangling over the security proposal and new GOP concerns over the Trump administration's USD 1.776 billion settlement fund.

Republican senators were set to meet with acting Attorney General Todd Blanche on Thursday morning as they finalised the text and decided whether to put parameters on the settlement, which was designed to compensate Trump's allies who believe they have been politically persecuted.

The last-minute scramble comes as Democrats have criticised Republicans for trying to fund Trump's ballroom when voters are concerned about basic affordability issues - and as some GOP lawmakers have grown increasingly frustrated with Trump.

Several GOP senators have spoken out against the settlement, which was announced this week, and many were upset by the president's endorsement Tuesday of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in the party primary runoff next week against Sen. John Cornyn.

''There's always a consequence with taking on United States senators,'' Thune said Wednesday. The president ''obviously has his favourites and people he wants to endorse and that's his prerogative. But what we have to deal with up here is moving the agenda, and obviously that can become slightly more complicated.''.

Republicans could set parameters on Trump's settlement fund.

----------------------------------------------------------------------.

The ''anti-weaponisation'' fund, part of a settlement that resolves Trump's lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service over the leak of his tax returns, has unexpectedly become one of the main complications in the bill. Democrats said they would force votes to block it or place restrictions on it.

Democrats have an opening because Republicans are trying to pass the immigration enforcement bill through a complicated budget process that requires a long series of amendment votes.

Democrats are considering multiple amendments, potentially to block that new fund outright or to ban any payments to Trump supporters who harmed law enforcement officers in the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol.

Those amendments, along with others, could pass as a growing number of Republicans have voiced reservations about the fund.

So Republicans are now discussing their own last-minute additions to head that off, potentially placing some parameters on the settlement and who could receive compensation, according to two people with knowledge of the private discussions who requested anonymity to discuss them.

Thune -- who said Tuesday that he is ''not a big fan'' of the settlement and doesn't see a purpose for it -- said Wednesday that any new language potentially putting restrictions on the settlement is ''a work in progress.''.

It's unclear how any Senate Republican changes would be received in the House, even as some Republicans there have also criticised the settlement.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said Wednesday that the House will pass the bill ''whatever form it takes.''.

Secret Service request falters as Republicans want more detail.

----------------------------------------------------------------------.

Under the Secret Service's request, about USD 220 million would fund security improvements related to the ballroom. The rest would go for a new screening centre for visitors, training and other security measures.

Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., said the effort to add the security package to the bill was a ''bad idea.'' The bill should not have included the other security improvements, he said, ''because it's just giving everybody the billion-dollar ballroom.'''.

Several other Republicans in the House and Senate have questioned the request, and senators left a briefing with the director of the Secret Service last week saying they needed a lot more information.

People ''can't afford groceries and gasoline and healthcare, and we're going to do a billion dollars for a ballroom?'' asked Louisiana Sen. Bill Cassidy, who lost reelection in his GOP primary on Saturday after Trump endorsed one of his opponents.

Left in the bill is the money for ICE and Border Patrol, which Democrats have blocked for months in protest of the Trump administration's immigration enforcement crackdown.

Democrats demanded reforms for the agencies, but negotiations with the White House yielded little progress.

So Republicans are using the complicated budget maneuver called reconciliation - the same process that allowed them to pass Trump's tax and spending cuts bill last year - to fund the agencies through the end of Trump's term with a simple majority and no Democratic votes.

Still, passage requires sign-off from the parliamentarian and unity from Republicans.

''We're working on it,'' Thune said as he left the Capitol on Wednesday evening.