Power grid losses costing billions: Can tech stop the drain?

Artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms are also gaining ground as diagnostic tools. These technologies can detect unusual consumption patterns, identify malfunctioning components, and optimize grid operation through predictive maintenance. In one case study reviewed, an AI-based fault detection system successfully identified voltage fluctuations and reduced energy waste in an Indian distribution network.


CO-EDP, VisionRICO-EDP, VisionRI | Updated: 25-03-2025 22:11 IST | Created: 25-03-2025 22:11 IST
Power grid losses costing billions: Can tech stop the drain?
Representative Image. Credit: ChatGPT

Electricity losses in power transmission and distribution systems continue to impose severe economic and environmental costs worldwide, despite decades of technological progress. A new systematic review published in Applied Sciences highlights the urgency of reducing both technical and non-technical losses in power grids and evaluates the effectiveness of modern strategies aimed at improving efficiency.

The review, titled "Electricity Losses in Focus: Detection and Reduction Strategies—State of the Art" and conducted by researchers from Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University in Saudi Arabia and Central University of Karnataka in India, analyzes 60 peer-reviewed studies published between 2013 and 2023. The authors sought to identify the main causes of energy loss across power systems and to assess emerging solutions, including smart grid technologies, artificial intelligence (AI), real-time monitoring, and advanced control methods.

Power losses are typically divided into two categories: technical losses, which occur due to energy dissipation in electrical components, and non-technical losses, often stemming from theft, billing errors, or data tampering. According to the review, technical losses account for the majority of energy waste, especially in high-voltage transmission lines and overloaded distribution networks. In many developing countries, however, non-technical losses, often linked to inadequate metering or electricity theft, can exceed technical losses and lead to major financial deficits for utility providers.

Globally, power loss rates vary considerably by country and region. The review reports that developed countries such as the United States, Germany, and Japan maintain total loss rates below 8%, while parts of Africa, South Asia, and Latin America experience losses exceeding 30% of total generated electricity. These disparities reflect differences in infrastructure, regulatory enforcement, and technological adoption.

The economic impact is substantial. In India alone, transmission and distribution (T&D) losses are estimated to cost the power sector billions of dollars annually. In Nigeria, non-technical losses stemming from electricity theft and inaccurate billing remain one of the primary obstacles to grid modernization. The review emphasizes that unless addressed, power losses will continue to undermine the financial viability of utilities and the sustainability of energy systems.

The authors note that significant technical losses arise from long transmission distances, aging equipment, and load imbalances. Conductors, transformers, and other components dissipate energy in the form of heat due to resistance. These losses become especially acute in densely populated or geographically expansive regions with outdated infrastructure.

Smart grid systems were identified as one of the most promising technologies for reducing these inefficiencies. By integrating digital sensors, automated controls, and communication networks, smart grids enable real-time monitoring and dynamic load balancing. Several studies cited in the review demonstrated that advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) and distribution automation systems can reduce technical losses by up to 20%.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning algorithms are also gaining ground as diagnostic tools. These technologies can detect unusual consumption patterns, identify malfunctioning components, and optimize grid operation through predictive maintenance. In one case study reviewed, an AI-based fault detection system successfully identified voltage fluctuations and reduced energy waste in an Indian distribution network.

At the policy level, regulatory support is considered essential for driving down non-technical losses. Countries with strong legal frameworks and enforcement mechanisms, such as South Korea and Singapore, maintain some of the world’s lowest power loss rates. The review urges governments to implement stricter penalties for electricity theft, improve access to metering, and encourage public-private partnerships to finance grid upgrades.

Despite the promise of emerging technologies, the review cautions that there is no one-size-fits-all solution. In regions with high non-technical losses, such as parts of Sub-Saharan Africa or Southeast Asia, investing in legal enforcement and community engagement may yield more immediate results than high-tech upgrades. Conversely, in industrialized countries with aging infrastructure, grid modernization and equipment replacement remain top priorities.

The review also highlights the role of distributed generation, such as rooftop solar panels and microgrids, in reducing transmission losses. Decentralizing power production shortens the distance between generation and consumption points, cutting down on energy dissipation. However, integrating these sources into the grid requires careful planning to avoid new stability and synchronization issues.

Among the challenges identified, the lack of harmonized data across regions and inconsistent methodologies for measuring losses pose significant barriers to comparative analysis. The authors call for the creation of international benchmarks and open-access databases to facilitate research and policy alignment.

The review offers several recommendations. First, utilities should adopt hybrid loss-reduction strategies that combine technical upgrades with regulatory reform. Second, governments must invest in workforce training to manage increasingly complex grid systems. Third, international institutions should support capacity building and knowledge transfer between high- and low-efficiency regions.

  • FIRST PUBLISHED IN:
  • Devdiscourse
Give Feedback