Supreme Court Declines PIL on Temple VIP Darshans
The Supreme Court dismissed a PIL challenging VIP darshan fees in temples, stating the issue is for temple management to decide. The plea argued the fees violated constitutional equality by favoring wealthier devotees over others. The decision does not prevent authorities from taking action.

- Country:
- India
The Supreme Court on Friday chose not to entertain a public interest litigation (PIL) that questioned the contentious practice of charging additional fees for 'VIP darshan' at temples, which allegedly offers preferential treatment to affluent devotees.
The case, presided by Chief Justice Sanjiv Khanna and Justice Sanjay Kumar, concluded with the court asserting that it is up to society and temple authorities to resolve the matter. Advocate Akash Vashishtha, representing the petitioner, argued against the arbitrary nature of these VIP privileges at sacred locations like Jyotirlingas.
The plea, initiated by Vijay Kishor Goswami, sevait at Shri Radha Madan Mohan Temple, claimed the practice breached constitutional rights of equality by discriminating against financially disadvantaged devotees. It called for standard operating procedures to ensure equitable temple access across India and proposed forming a national temple management board.
(With inputs from agencies.)
ALSO READ
Promoting Fair Work Practices and Gender Equality in Uzbekistan's Cotton Sector
Nomakhosazana Meth Urges G20 to Tackle Labour Inequality and Promote Fair Economic Growth
BRICS Unveils Roadmap for Rapid Gender Equality Revolution
Bridging the Gender Gap in Social Protection: ILO Outlines Roadmap to Equality
Lee Jae-myung's Presidential Run: A Quest for Equality and Growth