Sri Lanka's Fertilizer Policy Reversal: A Costly Turn for Rice Farmers

Four years post the abrupt fertilizer ban that led to protests and weakened Sri Lanka's economy, the impact on farmers like K.K.G. Thilakabandara persists. While inorganic farming resumes, expenses for farmers have risen, with many forced into debt. The reversal, aimed at boosting rice production, remains a costly endeavor.

Four years after Sri Lanka's sudden fertilizer ban sparked protests and contributed to economic turmoil, farmers like K.K.G. Thilakabandara still grapple with its effects.

The 2021 ban was introduced abruptly, leaving farmers without time for adjustment. "The switch to organic wasn't feasible, causing desperation among farmers," said Thilakabandara, a leader in Sri Lanka's largest rice farming association. Despite lifting the ban within seven months, fertilizer remains costly and initially scarce, posing challenges for farmers struggling with rising prices and debt.

While the government aims to increase rice cultivation to ensure food supplies, the pivot back to inorganic farming is financially onerous. Fertilizer purchases have soared, incurring significant expenses for the state. The move underscores the challenges in reversing a policy intended to make Sri Lanka the world's first fully organic farming nation, a shift that led to reduced rice output and widespread public dissent.

(With inputs from agencies.)