NCLAT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against HUL: Legal Paths Ahead

The NCLAT rejected an insolvency plea against Hindustan Unilever Limited by an operational creditor, Lalithambica Enterprises. The tribunal upheld a prior ruling due to a pre-existing dispute and insufficient claim amount. However, the creditor can seek alternative legal remedies as per the law.

NCLAT Dismisses Insolvency Plea Against HUL: Legal Paths Ahead
This image is AI-generated and does not depict any real-life event or location. It is a fictional representation created for illustrative purposes only.
  • Country:
  • India

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has dismissed a plea seeking the initiation of insolvency proceedings against Hindustan Unilever Limited (HUL). Filed by operational creditor K Lakshmi Narayana of Lalithambica Enterprises, the plea alleged default on payments.

The Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had previously rejected this Section 9 IBC application on September 5, 2024. The NCLT found that the claims within the three-year limitation were below the required Rs 1 crore threshold.

Further, NCLAT observed a pre-existing dispute dating back to a legal notice issued on January 17, 2019, leading to the dismissal of the appeal. The creditor can explore other legal avenues under existing laws.

Give Feedback

Use this form for editorial or site feedback. We usually reply within 2 to 3 working days.

By submitting, you agree that we may use your email address to respond.