End of the Conflict: India-Pakistan Tensions and the Path to Ceasefire

India's Defence Minister, Rajnath Singh, refuted claims of American involvement in India and Pakistan's truce, asserting India met its objectives independently. The recent conflict followed a deadly attack on Indian Kashmir, increasing tension between the nuclear neighbors. Allegations, military exchanges, and political disputes have fueled longstanding rivalries.

In the wake of heightened tensions, India's Defence Minister Rajnath Singh stated on Monday that New Delhi's recent military conflict with Pakistan ended on India's terms, successfully meeting its political and military objectives. This statement contradicted U.S. President Donald Trump's claims of brokering the ceasefire.

The turmoil stemmed from the April 22 attack on Hindu tourists in Indian Kashmir, which resulted in a fierce four-day conflict in May—marking the worst altercation between the nuclear-armed neighbors in decades. Singh stressed, "India halted its operation because all the political and military objectives studied before and during the conflict had been fully achieved."

Allegations have swirled around the involvement of Pakistani nationals in the Kashmir attack, but Islamabad denied the accusations and called for an independent investigation. As both sides exchanged deadly firepower, including fighter jets and missiles, political narratives remained polarized, with India asserting no external pressure prompted the truce.

(With inputs from agencies.)