Setback for DOJ: Evidence Return Ordered in Comey-Linked Case

A federal judge has ruled prosecutors must return seized evidence related to a case involving a former FBI Director James Comey aide. The U.S. Department of Justice can seek a new warrant though. The dismissed case highlights disputes over prosecutions amid political tensions involving critics of former President Trump.

In a significant judicial ruling, a federal judge has mandated the return of evidence seized from a key figure in the initial dismissed proceedings against former FBI Director James Comey, sparking a renewed legal debate. However, the Department of Justice retains the ability to procure a new warrant for the information.

This ruling marks a temporary setback for prosecutors who are contemplating further action against Comey, a known critic of former President Donald Trump. Daniel Richman, a law professor and former attorney for Comey, previously sued to prevent the use of the material, alleging it was improperly seized during earlier investigations.

While Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly allowed the safekeeping of seized documents with the court, she highlighted potential Fourth Amendment violations concerning unreasonable search and seizure. Yet, the DOJ is permitted to use insights from the files to further their case, provided they secure a new warrant.